Ex Parte KAMP - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2001-0078                                                       
         Application No. 08/892,131                                                 

         dispensed.  Further, the flexible pouch is surrounded by an                
         annular or perimetrical frame which depends from a chassis and             
         serves to protect the pouch from impact and shock loads.                   
              Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                 
         follows:                                                                   
                   1.  In a liquid containment and dispensing device                
              having a rigid, generally cup-shaped outer shell with an              
              open end and an opposed pair of sidewalls, each of the                
              opposed pair of sidewalls having a longitudinally extending           
              recess therein, a chassis secured to the open end of the              
              shell, the chassis having a pumping mechanism with a liquid           
              outlet therefrom the chassis further having a planar portion          
              extending transversely of the open end of the shell, a                
              flexible pouch having an open end and a closed end, the               
              closed end being positioned within the shell, the chassis             
              further having an annular frame, extending transversely from          
              the planar portion, the frame surrounding the flexible pouch          
              and having an opposed pair of side members with a rib                 
              portion extending outwardly from each of said side members,           
              characterized in that each of said opposed pair of side               
              members is adjacent one of the sidewalls of the outer shell,          
              the rib portion of each of said opposed pair of side members          
              extending into one of the recesses in the sidewall of the             
              shell.                                                                
              The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                       
         Barinaga                      5,721,576           Feb. 24, 1998            
                                                 (filed Dec. 04, 1995)              
         Clark et al. (Clark)          5,734,401           Mar. 31, 1998            
                                                 (filed Dec. 04, 1995)              

              Claims 1-6, 13, 15, and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
         § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Clark in view of Barinaga.             



                                         2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007