The opinion in support of the decision being entered today:
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal;
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YUN-HO JUNG
____________
Appeal 2001-0107
Application 09/143,5051
____________
ON BRIEF2
____________
Before: GARRIS, PAWLIKOWSKI, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of a primary examiner
rejecting claims 1 through 4, 6 through 14, and 16 through 36,
all the claims remaining in the application. We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed August 28, 1998. Appellant claims the
benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 based on Korean Application P97-44218,
filed August 30, 1997. According to Appellant, the real party in interest is LG
Philips LCD Inc. Ltd. (Brief at 1.)
2 Appellant requested a hearing (Paper No. 18, filed July 14, 2000), but
subsequently waived the hearing (Paper No. 21, filed May 16, 2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007