Appeal No. 2001-0149
Application 08/896,001
information between logic devices in the same row or column
as recited in claims 1, 7, 10, and 17. Since claims 2-6,
8-9, 11-16, and 18 are dependent on independent claims 1, 7,
10, and 17, we also cannot sustain the art rejections of
these claims. Therefore, we cannot sustain the rejection of
claims 1-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
REVERSED
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MRF:psb
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007