Ex parte ARTUS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-0181                                                        
          Application No. 09/195,999                                                  


          reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in the                
          APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 15).                                       
               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the               
          documents listed below:                                                     


          Spier                    3,807,062                     Apr. 30,             
          1974                                                                        
          Wittmann et al.          4,907,353                     Mar. 13,             
          1990 (Wittmann)                                                             

               The following rejections are before us for review.                     


               Claims 1 and 10 through 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.                               


               Claims 1, 12 through 16, 18, and 19 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Wittmann.                        


               Claims 10, 11, and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103 as being unpatentable over Wittmann, as applied above,                  
          further  in view of Spier.                                                  


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007