Appeal No. 2001-0181 Application No. 09/195,999 specification (pages 3 and 6) which describes the first embodiment (elected species of Figs. 1 through 3; Paper No. 5) as including an intermediate sole having a flexible intermediate zone, with the intermediate sole being made of a semi-rigid plastic and comprising the intermediate flexible portion 6. In light of the above, we conclude that the recitation of a "semi-rigid intermediate zone" in claim 1 is definite in meaning, and would be understood by those versed in the art. The obviousness rejections We do not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 12 through 16, 18, and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Wittmann as well as the rejection of claims 10, 11, and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Wittmann and Spier. Claim 1 is explicitly addressed to an alpine ski boot with the feature, inter alia, of "an intermediate sole (2) comprising a semi-rigid intermediate zone (6) to which are 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007