Ex Parte JOHNSON - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-0280                                                        
          Application No. 08/890,398                                                  


          applies the forwarded portion of the payment to an outstanding              
          loan amount owed by the merchant to reduce the outstanding loan             
          amount.                                                                     
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
                    1.  A method for automated loan repayment,                        
               comprising:                                                            
                    at a merchant, accepting a customer identifier as                 
               payment from the customer and electronically forwarding                
               information related to the payment to a computerized                   
               merchant processor;                                                    
                    at the computerized merchant processor, acquiring                 
               the information related to the payment from the                        
               merchant, authorizing and settling the payment, and                    
               forwarding at least a portion of the payment to a                      
               computerized loan repayment receiver as repayment of at                
               least a portion of an outstanding loan amount owed by                  
               the merchant; and                                                      
                    at the computerized loan repayment receiver,                      
               receiving the portion of the payment forwarded by the                  
               computerized merchant processor and applying that                      
               portion to the outstanding loan amount owed by the                     
               merchant to reduce that outstanding loan amount.                       
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Cohen et al. (Cohen)          4,750,119           Jun. 07, 1988             
          Hilt et al. (Hilt)            5,465,206           Nov. 07, 1995             
               Claims 1-19 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).           
          As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner offers Cohen alone with            
          respect to claims 1-6, 8-15, and 17-19, and adds Hilt to Cohen              
          with respect to claims 7 and 16.                                            


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007