Ex Parte STICKLES et al - Page 1




                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                                                                                             Paper No. 14             

                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                      
                               Ex parte RICHARD W. STICKLES and JOHN L. HALPIN                                        
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                                Appeal No. 2001-0299                                                  
                                              Application No. 08/993,861                                              
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                    ____________                                                      
             Before ABRAMS, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
             BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       



                                          ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                    
                    This is a decision on appellants’ request for rehearing (Paper No. 13) of our                     
             decision mailed June 26, 2002 (Paper No. 12) sustaining the examiner’s rejections of                     
             claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14 and 15 as being anticipated by Koch, of claims 1 and 12 as                 
             being anticipated by Angel and of claims 7-9 and 14 as being anticipated by Dooley.                      











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007