The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RICHARD W. STICKLES and JOHN L. HALPIN ____________ Appeal No. 2001-0299 Application No. 08/993,861 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is a decision on appellants’ request for rehearing (Paper No. 13) of our decision mailed June 26, 2002 (Paper No. 12) sustaining the examiner’s rejections of claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14 and 15 as being anticipated by Koch, of claims 1 and 12 as being anticipated by Angel and of claims 7-9 and 14 as being anticipated by Dooley.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007