Appeal No. 2001-0476
Application No. 08/768,231
(A,B) or (P,Q) servo bursts.'" See page 11, lines 13-15 of the
Brief. Rather, "a clear statement of every detail is not
required; only enough to enable the person of skilled in art to
make and use the invention is necessary for the disclosure to be
'enabling' under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (first paragraph)." See page
11, line 19 to page 12, line 1 of the Brief. Appellants then
make a concluding statement that "one of ordinary skill in the
art, upon reviewing the disclosure of the invention as originally
filed . . . would be able to make and use the invention recited
in claims 46 thru 53 without undue experimentation." See page
12, lines 2-5 of the Brief.
In response to Appellant's arguments, the Examiner states
that he can find no support in the specification, original claims
or the drawings for the limitation "ONLY." See page 6, lines 5
and 6 of the Answer.
In our review of Appellant's originally filed application,
(the entire specification, original claims and drawings), we fail
to find any support for the newly claimed subject matter in
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007