Appeal No. 2001-0687 Application No. 09/080,070 examiner’s rationale is mistaken or how the examiner has misconstrued the teachings of the references, we will sustain the rejection of dependent claims 5, 7, 9, 11 and 15-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EAK:clm -6-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007