Ex Parte HAO et al - Page 1


                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                                     Paper No. 15                   
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                   __________                                                       
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   __________                                                       
                                Ex parte ZHIMIN HAO, ALAIN CLAUDE ROCHAT                                            
                                        and NANCY SCHLODER-TEBALDI                                                  
                                                   __________                                                       
                                              Appeal No.  2001-0934                                                 
                                           Application No.  09/294,483                                              
                                                   __________                                                       
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                   __________                                                       
                 Before WINTERS, SCHEINER, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
                 ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                              
                 examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-7.  Claims 1-16 are pending, however,                       
                 claims 8-16 have been withdrawn from consideration as a result of a restriction                    
                 requirement.                                                                                       















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007