Ex Parte PACZEWITZ - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0948                                                        
          Application No. 08/959,138                                                  
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    1.  A method for selecting printing features at print             
               time comprising the steps of:                                          
                    (a) upon a user selecting to perform a first print job            
               from an application, displaying a print dialog box;                    
                    (b) upon the user closing the print dialog box without            
               canceling the first print job, displaying a media-type pop-            
               up dialog box which allows a user to specify which type of             
               media is to be used for printing the first print job;                  
                    (c) upon the user changing selection of media-type,               
               changing print parameters for the first print job; and                 
                    (d) upon the user closing the media-type pop-up dialog            
               box without canceling the first print job, printing the                
               first print job.                                                       
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Kimura et al. (Kimura)        4,666,801           May  19, 1987             
          Stephenson et al. (Stephenson) 5,369,419          Nov. 29, 1994             
          Laumeyer et al. (Laumeyer)    5,572,632           Nov.  5, 1996             
          Kubo et al. (Kubo)            5,828,461           Oct. 27, 1998             
          (filed Nov. 15, 1996)                                                       
          Cameron et al. (Cameron)      5,839,117           Nov. 17, 1998             
                                             (filed Jan.  6, 1997)                    
          Anglin et al. (Anglin)        5,862,322           Jan. 19, 1999             
                                                  (filed Feb. 15, 1996)               
               Claims 1 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Kubo in view of Laumeyer.                           
               Claims 2 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Kubo in view of Laumeyer and Anglin.                


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007