Appeal No. 2001-0948
Application No. 08/959,138
Claims 3 through 5 and 12 through 14 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kubo in view of
Laumeyer, Stephenson and Kimura.
Claims 6 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Kubo in view of Laumeyer, Anglin,
Stephenson and Kimura.
Claims 7 through 9 and 16 through 18 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kubo in view of
Laumeyer, Anglin, Stephenson, Kimura and Cameron.
Reference is made to the briefs (paper numbers 8 and 11) and
the answer (paper number 10) for the respective positions of the
appellant and the examiner.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the entire record before us,
and we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 1 through
18.
All of the claims on appeal specifically recite the steps of
displaying a media-type pop-up dialog box “upon . . . closing” a
previously opened print dialog box.
The examiner’s contentions (answer, page 4) to the contrary
notwithstanding, the main menu display 63 (Figure 4) and the main
menu display 90 (Figure 9A) in Kubo are neither print dialog
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007