Ex Parte PENNINI et al - Page 1




        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not           
        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                              Paper No. 25           

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    __________                                       
                              Ex parte GIANNI PENNINI,                               
                                  ARRIGO ARLETTI,                                    
                                        and                                          
                                  GIAMPIERO MORINI                                   
                                    __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-0968                                 
                             Application No. 08/894,423                              
                                    ___________                                      
                                 HEARD: May 7, 2002                                  
                                    ___________                                      
         Before KIMLIN, DELMENDO, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent                  
         Judges.                                                                     
         DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
         the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 13, which are            
         all of the claims pending in the above-identified application.              
               The subject matter on appeal relates to: a solid catalyst             
         component for the polymerization of olefins (claims 1-8 and 11-             
         13); a process for the preparation of the solid catalyst                    
         component (claim 9); and a process for the polymerization of                
         particular olefins in the presence of the solid catalyst                    
         component (claim 10).  The solid catalyst component of the                  







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007