Ex Parte TAGUCHI - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                 Paper No. 20         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte DAIGO TAGUCHI                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2001-1073                                 
                              Application No. 08/747,356                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                HEARD: August 14, 2002                                
                                     ____________                                     
          Before KRASS, LALL, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-8, 10, 14-17 and            
          20.                                                                         
               According to Appellant (brief at pages 2 and 3), the present           
          invention provides a visual user interface for describing or                
          specifying shifts between screens.  The visual user interface               
          includes an edit image including node icons representative of the           
          screens and data icons associated with and disposed within the node         
          icons.  In Figure 4 of Appellant’s disclosure, the node icons are           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007