Appeal No. 2001-1073
Application No. 08/747,356
Additionally, regarding independent claim 6, it further recites
the feature of a scroll control means for instructing said edit
image creating means to create an edit image with a scroll bar
attached thereto (see item f of claim 6). Therefore, we are not
convinced that the Examiner has established a prima facie case of
obviousness within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of independent claims
1, 6 and 14 and the dependent claims 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 15, 16,
17 and 20 over Peterson, Hansen and Kogan.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007