The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte
MICHAEL D. ARMACOST, DAVID M. DOBUZINSKY,
JOHN C. MALINOWSKI, HUNG Y. NG,
RICHARD S. WISE, and CHIENFAN YU
Appeal No. 2001-1133
Application No. 09/014,806
ON BRIEF
Before WALTZ, LIEBERMAN and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner
refusing to allow claims 1 through 3, 5 through 10, 12, 13, and 15 through 18, which
are all the claims pending in this application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007