Appeal No. 2001-1214 Page 10
Application No. 09/213,726
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 17 to 19, 22 and 25
to 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Hummel is reversed; the
decision of the examiner to reject claims 17 to 19, 22 to 24 and 28 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Travnicek is reversed; and the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 25 to 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Travnicek in view of Hummel is reversed.
REVERSED
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007