Appeal No. 2001-1249 Application 08/658,341 27. A grease formulation comprising a mixture of (1) an environmentally friendly inorganic thickener or a gelling agent additive thickener, and (2) a base stock, said base stock consisting essentially of a neopentyl polyol ester consisting essentially of the reaction product of a neopentyl polyol and a C12-C20 monocarboxylic acid, said base stock having the following characteristics: (i) flash point of 175°C; (ii) kinematic viscosity of less than 15 cSt at 100°C; and a biodegradability of $ 70%, as determined by CEC-L-33-T-82. THE REFERENCES Mores et al. (Mores) 4,066,789 Jan. 3, 1978 Tubbs et al. (Tubbs) 4,557,839 Dec. 10, 1985 Zehler et al. (Zehler ‘990) 4,589,990 May 20, 1986 Zehler et al. (Zehler ‘840) 4,601,840 Jul. 22, 1986 Mullin 4,780,229 Oct. 25, 1988 King 4,965,001 Oct. 23, 1990 Schmid et al. (Schmid) 5,057,247 Oct. 15, 1991 THE REJECTION Claims 8, 16, 24-29, 31-34 and 40-44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of Schmid, Mullin, Zehler ‘990, King, Tubbs, Zehler ‘840 and Mores. OPINION We affirm the aforementioned rejection. The appellant states (brief, page 4): “Claims 27, 8, 16, 28, 29 and 31 may be considered to stand or fall together, but not 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007