Ex Parte ZEHLER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1249                                                        
          Application 08/658,341                                                      


               27.  A grease formulation comprising a mixture of (1) an               
          environmentally friendly inorganic thickener or a gelling agent             
          additive thickener, and (2) a base stock, said base stock                   
          consisting essentially of a neopentyl polyol ester consisting               
          essentially of the reaction product of a neopentyl polyol and a             
          C12-C20 monocarboxylic acid, said base stock having the following           
          characteristics:                                                            
               (i) flash point of 175°C;                                              
               (ii) kinematic viscosity of less than 15 cSt at 100°C;                 
                                                                                     
               and a biodegradability of $ 70%, as determined by                      
          CEC-L-33-T-82.                                                              
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Mores et al. (Mores)               4,066,789        Jan.  3, 1978           
          Tubbs et al. (Tubbs)               4,557,839        Dec. 10, 1985           
          Zehler et al. (Zehler ‘990)        4,589,990        May  20, 1986           
          Zehler et al. (Zehler ‘840)        4,601,840        Jul. 22, 1986           
          Mullin                             4,780,229        Oct. 25, 1988           
          King                               4,965,001        Oct. 23, 1990           
          Schmid et al. (Schmid)             5,057,247        Oct. 15, 1991           
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 8, 16, 24-29, 31-34 and 40-44 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings           
          of Schmid, Mullin, Zehler ‘990, King, Tubbs, Zehler ‘840 and                
          Mores.                                                                      
                                       OPINION                                        
               We affirm the aforementioned rejection.                                
               The appellant states (brief, page 4): “Claims 27, 8, 16, 28,           
          29 and 31 may be considered to stand or fall together, but not              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007