Appeal No. 2001-1269
Application No. 08/939,685
For the reasons expressed supra for claims 1 and 4, the
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims 13 and 19 is
sustained. The 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims
16 through 18 is sustained because appellants have not
presented any patentability arguments for these claims.
For the reason set forth supra for claim 12, the
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims 15, 20 and 22 is
reversed.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through
22 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is affirmed as to claims 1, 2,
4, 5, 11, 13 and 16 through 19, and is reversed as to claims
3, 6 through 10, 12, 14, 15 and 20 through 22. Accordingly,
the decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007