The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BYEONG-DUCK LEE
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1448
Application No. 09/121,036
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 12 through 28, all of the claims remaining in
this application. On page 11 of the examiner's answer (Paper No.
18), it has been indicated that claims 26 through 28 now stand
objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but
would be allowable if rewritten in independent form.
Accordingly, only claims 12 through 25 remain for our
consideration on appeal. Claims 1 through 11 have been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007