Ex Parte LEE - Page 2



                    Appeal No. 2001-1448                                                                                                                                  
                    Application No. 09/121,036                                                                                                                            

                    As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant's                                                                                                  
                    invention relates to a semiconductor chip package having a clip-                                                                                      
                    type lead frame and the method of fabrication thereof.  More                                                                                          
                    particularly, the invention before us on appeal is limited to the                                                                                     
                    method of fabricating a chip package.  A copy of representative                                                                                       
                    independent claims 12 and 21 can be found in the Appendix to                                                                                          
                    appellant's brief.                                                                                                                                    

                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                                                 
                    examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                                        
                    Kikuchi et al. (Kikuchi)                                   5,084,694                               Jan. 28, 1992                                      
                    Song                                                       5,554,886                               Sep. 10, 1996                                      
                    Kim et al. (Kim)                                           5,625,221                               Apr. 29, 1997                                      

                    Claims 12 through 17 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                                            
                    § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Song in view of Kikuchi.                                                                                          

                    Claims 18, 19 and 21 through 25 stand rejected under                                                                                                  
                    35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Song in view of                                                                                         
                    Kikuchi and further in view of Kim.                                                                                                                   

                    Rather than reiterate the examiner's specific comments                                                                                                
                    regarding the above-noted rejections and the conflicting                                                                                              
                                                                                    22                                                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007