The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL ANTHONY DAVIES
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1493
Application No. 09/109,016
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 10-12, 14-
1
17, 20, 21, 24 and 25. Claims 1-9, 22 and 23, the only other claims pending in this
We interpret the examiner’s explanation of the status of amendments after final on page 2 of the1
answer as indicating that appellant’s amendment to claim 24 filed June 14, 2000 (Paper No. 7) has been
approved for entry by the examiner. We also note, however, that this amendment has not been clerically
entered. Upon return of this application to the Technology Center, the examiner should take appropriate
action to have the amendment entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007