Appeal No. 2001-1514 Page 7 Application No. 08/874,805 connected to a compression sleeve to a second end fixedly joined to the manifold of the controller connection device. For the reasons set forth above, the examiner has not presented a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to claim 1. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 6, 8, 10, 11 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.2 2 We have also reviewed the references to Wright and Sikora additionally applied in the rejections of claims 8 and 11 but find nothing therein which makes up for the deficiencies of Arkans and Mogaki discussed above.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007