Ex Parte URABE et al - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for               
                             publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                                                                              Paper No. 26                     
                                                                                                              
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                               _____________                                                   
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               _____________                                                   
                                          Ex parte TETSUO URABE,                                               
                                 HIDEO KATAOKA and NOBUYUKI SHIGENO                                            
                                               _____________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 2001-1516                                               
                                          Application No. 08/684,299                                           
                                              ______________                                                   
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                     
                                              _______________                                                  
             Before KRASS, BARRETT and DIXON,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
             KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                   This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 20-24.  Claims              
             26-35 stand withdrawn as being directed to a non-elected invention.  Claims 1-19 and              
             25 have been canceled.                                                                            
                   The invention is directed to a liquid crystal display (LCD) device.  More                   
             particularly, the structure has, inter alia, a plurality of reflective pixel electrodes wherein   









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007