Ex Parte URABE et al - Page 3




                Appeal No. 2001-1516                                                                                                       
                Application No. 08/684,299                                                                                                 


                                a switching element associated with each of the pixel electrodes,                                          
                        said switching elements being formed beneath the respective pixel                                                  
                        electrode;                                                                                                         
                                a lower substrate following beneath the switching element; and                                             
                                said optical thin-film layer including a plurality of coloring areas, and                                  
                        a pattern is formed for each coloring area, so as to form color filters.                                           
                        The examiner relies on the following references:                                                                   
                        Iida et al. (Iida)                       5,472,635                        Dec. 05, 1995                            
                        Abileah et al. (Abileah)                 5,499,126                        Mar. 12, 1996                            
                        Adachi et al. (Adachi)           JP 06-222,351                            Aug. 12, 1994                            
                        Claims 20-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Adachi                                      
                in view of  Iida and Abileah.                                                                                              
                        Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of                                         
                appellants and the examiner.                                                                                               
                                                               OPINION                                                                     
                        To reach a proper conclusion under § 103, the decision maker must step                                             
                backward in  time and into the shoes worn by [a person having ordinary skill in the art]                                   
                when the invention was unknown and just before it was made.  In light of all the                                           
                evidence, the decision maker must then determine whether...the claimed invention as a                                      
                whole would have been obvious at that time to that person.  The answer to that                                             





                                                                    3                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007