Ex Parte DHONG et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-1571                                                                                        
              Application No. 09/062,002                                                                                  

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The invention relates to a method and system for accessing a cache memory                            
              within a data processing system.  Representative claim 1 is reproduced below.                               
                     1.     A method for accessing a cache memory within a data processing system                         
                     utilizing an effective address, wherein said effective address includes a byte                       
                     field, a line field, and an effective page number field, wherein said cache memory                   
                     includes a memory array along with a directory and a translation lookaside                           
                     buffer, said method comprising the steps of:                                                         
                            providing a translation array that includes an identical number of rows as                    
                     in said translation lookaside buffer, and an identical number of array entries                       
                     within each row as the product of cache lines per page of a system memory and                        
                     an associativity of said cache memory; and                                                           
                            in response to a cache access by an effective address, determining                            
                     whether or not said cache memory stores data associated with said effective                          
                     address utilizing said translation array.                                                            
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                     
              Brenza                              4,797,814                           Jan. 10, 1989                       
              Martens et al. (Martens)            5,970,512                           Oct. 19, 1999                       
                                                                              (filed Mar. 27, 1997)                       
                     Claims 1-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                          
              Martens and Brenza.                                                                                         
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 6) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper                       
              No. 13) for a statement of the examiner's position1 and to the Brief (Paper No. 11) and                     



                     1 The Answer refers to the rejection set forth in the non-final action, “Paper No. 4.”  However, the 
              rejection was repeated and made final in Paper No. 6.                                                       
                                                           -2-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007