Ex Parte TAKLE et al - Page 1


                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         
                                                                                      Paper No. 25                   
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                    __________                                                       
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                    __________                                                       
                               Ex parte GARRY B. TAKLE and SHAJI T. GEORGE                                           
                                                    __________                                                       
                                              Appeal No. 2001-17051                                                  
                                            Application No. 08/616,141                                               
                                                    __________                                                       
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                    __________                                                       
                 Before WINTERS, SCHEINER, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
                 ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 
                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                        This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                              
                 examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-8, 11-13, and 19-31.  Claims 9 and 10 are                    
                 free from rejection, and the examiner indicated (Answer, page 2) that claims 14-                    
                 18 are allowable.                                                                                   
                        Claim 19 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced                   
                 below:                                                                                              
                        19. A composition for delivering a compound having a net negative                            
                        charge to cells comprising                                                                   
                              a. a compound having a net negative charge ionically bound to a                        
                                  macrocycle having a net positive charge selected from the                          
                                  group consisting of natural porphyrins, natural phthalocyanins,                    
                                  synthetic porphyrins, synthetic phthalocyanins, and conjugates                     
                                                                                                                     
                 1 This appeal is related to Appeal No. 2001-1498 (Application No. 08/912,378) accordingly we        
                 have considered these two appeals together.                                                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007