The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ALOIS SCHAEFFELER
and PETER BROGHAMMER
__________
Appeal No. 2001-1799
Application 09/097,655
___________
HEARD: JULY 9, 2002
___________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-15, which constitute
all the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to an electric appliance
unit comprising an appliance and a plug-in battery pack
insertable into and removable from the appliance. More
particularly, the invention uses a first guiding means for
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007