Ex Parte SCHAEFFELER et al - Page 10

          Appeal No. 2001-1799                                                        
          Application 09/097,655                                                      

          Therefore, we do not sustain the examiner’s rejection of                    
          claims 1-15 based on the prior art applied by the examiner.                 
          Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-15             
          is reversed.                                                                
          REVERSED                                                                    






                                                       )                              
                         KENNETH W. HAIRSTON           )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         JERRY SMITH                   )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) INTERFERENCES                
                                                       )                              
                         LANCE LEONARD BARRY           )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              






                                         10                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007