Appeal No. 2001-1818
Application 09/048,533
happen to the finished product. The claim requires certain features, and although later
processing may destroy those features, thereby rendering the end use of the foil (or the
foil itself) essentially noninfringing, the scope of our inquiry need not extend that far.
We conclude that the language of the specification conveys to one of skill in the
art that the Applicant had possession of the invention as claimed at the filing date of this
application.
REVERSED
)
PAUL LIEBERMAN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ROMULO H. DELMENDO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
) APPEALS AND
)
)
JAMES T. MOORE ) INTERFERENCES
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
JTM/ ki
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007