Ex Parte HUANG - Page 1




                                                                                                                                                     
                                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                     
                                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            

                                                                                                                        Paper No. 22                  

                                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                     
                                                                   ____________                                                                       
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                     
                                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                       
                                                             Ex parte MISTY HUANG                                                                     
                                                                   ____________                                                                       
                                                               Appeal No. 2001-1986                                                                   
                                                            Application No. 08/719,968                                                                
                                                                   ____________                                                                       
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                       
                 Before PAK, WALTZ, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                    


                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                       
                          This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of                                
                 claims 13, 15, 16, 22 and 23, which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified application.                               
                          Claims 22 and  23 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows:                                   
                 22.      A process for fabricating a printing plate, said process comprising:                                                        
                          a).      selectively exposing a photosensitive resin composition consisting essentially of:                                 










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007