Appeal No. 2001-2151 Application No. 09/035,174 Thus, whether or not it would have been prima facie obvious to conduct the subject metathesis reaction in a distillation column reactor, the prior art provides no motivation to do so under conditions where water is present in the feed streams and is azeotropically removed in the column. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the examiner is reversed as to each of the rejections before us. REVERSED MARC L. CAROFF ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MARK NAGUMO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) MLC:hh 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007