Ex Parte LENTZ - Page 21


            Appeal No. 2001-2168                                                      
            Application No. 09/083,307                                                

            over Lentz in view of Wolpe is affirmed, and new grounds of               
            rejection of claims have been entered against claims 10                   
            through 15, 17, 21 and 23 under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).  Since                 
            our rationale supporting the examiner’s § 103 rejections                  
            differs from the examiner’s position, we herewith designate               
            our affirmance of all of the examiner’s rejections as new                 
            grounds of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                             
                 This decision contains new grounds of rejection                      
            pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) (amended effective Dec. 1,                  
            1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197                   
            (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63,               
            122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides, "[a] new               
            grounds of rejection shall not be considered final for                    
            purposes of judicial review."                                             
                 37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                  
            WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must                     
            exercise one of the following two options with respect to                 
            the new grounds of rejection to avoid termination of                      
            proceedings (37 CFR § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                
                 (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                           
                 claims so rejected or a showing of facts                             
                 relating to the claims so rejected, or both,                         
                 and have the matter reconsidered by the                              
                 examiner, in which event the application                             
                 will be remanded to the examiner . . . .                             



                                          21                                          



Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007