Appeal No. 2001-2292 Application No. 09/072,172 9. A personal care product system comprising a distribution/retention layer and a pad shaping layer wherein each layer has a stain length ratio of 0.5 or less and said distribution/retention layer has a saturation profile of 4 or less, a density between 0.1 and 0.2 g/cc and an average pore size diameter of about 40 to 500 microns. THE REJECTIONS Claim 9, and claims 14 through 16, 18 and 28 which depend therefrom, stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as being based on a non-enabling specification. Claims 9, 14 through 16, 18 and 28 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter the appellants regard as the invention. Attention is directed to the appellants’ brief (Paper No. 15) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 16) for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner with regard to the merits of these rejections. DISCUSSION I. The 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, rejection Insofar as the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is concerned, the dispositive issue is whether the appellant's disclosure, considering the level of ordinary skill in the art as of the date of the appellant's application, 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007