Ex Parte BURNES et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2001-2292                                                        
         Application No. 09/072,172                                                  

               9.  A personal care product system comprising a                       
         distribution/retention layer and a pad shaping layer wherein each           
         layer has a stain length ratio of 0.5 or less and said                      
         distribution/retention layer has a saturation profile of 4 or               
         less, a density between 0.1 and 0.2 g/cc and an average pore size           
         diameter of about 40 to 500 microns.                                        
                                                                                    
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                    
               Claim 9, and claims 14 through 16, 18 and 28 which depend             
         therefrom, stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,           
         as being based on a non-enabling specification.                             
               Claims 9, 14 through 16, 18 and 28 also stand rejected under          
         35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as failing to particularly               
         point out and distinctly claim the subject matter the appellants            
         regard as the invention.                                                    
               Attention is directed to the appellants’ brief (Paper No.             
         15) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 16) for the                     
         respective positions of the appellants and the examiner with                
         regard to the merits of these rejections.                                   


                                    DISCUSSION                                       
         I. The 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, rejection                          
               Insofar as the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112,             
         first paragraph, is concerned, the dispositive issue is whether             
         the appellant's disclosure, considering the level of ordinary               
         skill in the art as of the date of the appellant's application,             

                                         2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007