Appeal No. 2001-2292 Application No. 09/072,172 clear because of the claimed test values [examiner’s answer, page 4]. For the reasons discussed above in connection with the 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, rejection, the examiner’s position here is unfounded. Therefore, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, rejection of claims 9, 14 through 16, 18 and 28. SUMMARY The decision of the examiner to reject claims 9, 14 through 16, 18 and 28 is reversed. REVERSED IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) )) BOARD OF PATENT LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007