Ex parte DALUM - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             
                                                            Paper No. 8               

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                            Ex parte JOSEPH THOMAS DALUM                              
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2001-2393                                  
                               Application 09/197,878                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before STAAB, MCQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Joseph Thomas Dalum appeals from the final rejection of                
          claims 1 through 10, all of the claims pending in the                       
          application.                                                                
                                   THE INVENTION                                      
               The invention relates to “automotive passenger restraint               
          systems, and more particularly to a control method that                     
          differentiates deployment events from non-deployment events”                
          (specification, page 1).  Representative claim 1 reads as                   
          follows:                                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007