Appeal No. 2001-2411
Application No. 08/879,422
construed, the claimed method is not enabled. We therefore reverse the
rejection for nonenablement.
Summary
Read in light of the specification, the claim language is not indefinite, and
the claims are both adequately described and enabled by the specification. We
therefore reverse the rejections under the first and second paragraphs of
35 U.S.C. § 112.
REVERSED
Sherman D. Winters )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Demetra J. Mills )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Eric Grimes )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007