Ex Parte YIN et al - Page 6


              Appeal No. 2001-2443                                                                                           
              Application 09/108,541                                                                                         
              bleaching/delignification stage rather than an extraction stage as is conventionally used                      
              in the art.  (Examiner’s Answer, page 4, lines 4 - 14).                                                        
                      As set forth in Amgen Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 927 F.2d 1200,                          
              1217, 18 USPQ2d 1016, 1030 (Fed. Cir. 1991):                                                                   
                      The statute requires that “[t]he specification shall conclude with one or more                         
                      claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which                      
                      the applicant regards as his invention.”  A decision as to whether a claim is                          
                      invalid under this provision requires a determination whether those skilled in the                     
                      art would understand what is claimed.  See Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Libbey-                         
                      Owens Ford Co., 758 F.2d 613, 624, 225 USPQ 634, 641 (Fed. Cir.                                        
                      1985)(Claims must “reasonably apprise those skilled in the art” as to their scope                      
                      and be “as precise as the subject matter permits”)                                                     

                      The Applicant has used the term “extraction” in his claims in reference to the                         
              initial extraction stage and a second extraction stage (EO or OPD1EOPD2).  Extraction is a                     
              commonly understood term requiring the withdrawal or removal of a substance by                                 
              chemical or physical processes.  See, e.g., Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, (c)                           
              1979, pp. 403, a copy of which is attached to this opinion.  It includes, e.g. solubilization                  
              and removal of chlorinated lignins [delignification], removal of hemicellulose pentosan                        
              from fibers, saponification of fatty acids and rosin acids in pulp, etc. (See Appeal Brief,                    
              page XXXX, line XXXX).    The Examiner’s concerns notwithstanding, it is abundantly                            
              clear that extraction is required by the first and third steps in the bleaching process and                    
              accordingly claims 1, 11, and 20 are not indefinite.                                                           
                      The Examiner further finds claim 1 to be indefinite in the use of the term “the                        
              stage” at line 8 is inconsistent with the use of the term “the stages”, and in line 10,                        
              where EP is inconsistent with Eop.  (Examiner’s Answer, page 4, lines 14-16).                                  




                                                             6                                                               



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007