Appeal No. 2001-2444 Application No. 09/419,176 obtained. See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1052, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1439 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 (1988). Accordingly, we find that the examiner has not set forth a factual basis which is sufficient to support a conclusion of prima facie obviousness of the appellants’ claimed invention. We therefore reverse the examiner’s rejection. DECISION The rejection of claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Fiordalice in view of Chiang is reversed. REVERSED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) TERRY J. OWENS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) tjo/vsh 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007