Ex Parte CHANG - Page 5


                   Appeal No. 2001-2497                                                               Page 5                      
                   Application No. 08/855,744                                                                                     

                          agents which are highly toxic occurs after being administered                                           
                          separately.  Furthermore, all of the species being administered                                         
                          such as the binding molecules, remover substances, and the                                              
                          therapeutic agents are immunogenic and would appear to hinder                                           
                          long term administrations.  Therefore, in the absence of further                                        
                          guidelines, it would be undue experimentation to determine the                                          
                          conditions in which bifunctional binding molecules with which                                           
                          remover and which therapeutic agents would be operable as                                               
                          broadly claimed in the instant application.                                                             
                   Paper No. 5, pages 4-5.2  As we understand it, the examiner’s reasoning is that                                
                   the claimed method encompasses inoperative embodiments and undue                                               
                   experimentation would have been required to determine what embodiments                                         
                   within the scope of the claims are and are not operable.                                                       
                          The examiner bears the initial burden of establishing nonenablement.  See                               
                   In re Wright, 999 F.2d 1557, 1561-62, 27 USPQ2d 1510, 1513 (Fed. Cir. 1993)                                    
                   (“[T]he PTO bears an initial burden of setting forth a reasonable explanation as to                            
                   why it believes that the scope of protection provided by that claim is not                                     
                   adequately enabled by the description of the invention provided in the                                         
                   specification of the application; this includes, of course, providing sufficient                               
                   reasons for doubting any assertions in the specification as to the scope of                                    
                   enablement.”).                                                                                                 
                          That burden is not met by a bare assertion that a claimed method has not                                
                   been shown to work.  “Section 112 does not require that a specification convince                               
                   persons skilled in the art that the assertions therein are correct.”  In re                                    
                                                                                                                                  
                   2 Paper No. 5 includes an additional basis of nonenablement:  “The specification improperly                    
                   incorporates the essential material required to make and use the claimed invention.”  Page 4,                  
                   lines 25-27.  This basis, however, was apparently withdrawn in the next Office action.  See Paper              
                   No. 10 (mailed Jan. 13, 1993), page 3:  “[C]laims 1-3 . . . remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. §112,              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007