Appeal No. 2001-2559 Application No. 09/276,722 In light of the foregoing, the standing rejection of claims 13-15, 17, 18 and 21 is not sustainable. Remand This case is remanded to the examiner for consideration of the patentability of the appealed claims in light of the teachings of JP ‘046 and JP ‘613 as set forth and explained in the attached translations thereof. With respect to JP ‘046, we particularly note the disclosure at page 14, lines 11-13, of the translation that “silver, nickel, copper, etc.” (emphasis added) may be used as the filler material in conjunction with the nylon 6 or nylon 66 based material of JP ‘046. This disclosure appears to suggest that metals other than silver, nickel, and copper may be appropriate for the purposes of JP ‘046. We also note the disclosure at page 20 of the translation to the effect that fishing nets may be constructed in their entirety of the synthetic resin composition of JP ‘046. With respect to JP ‘613, we particularly note the disclosure at page 3, line 21, through page 4, line 21, that zinc may be used as a filler material in conjunction with a conventional polyolefin base material. We also note that this portion of JP ‘613 indicates that when compositions having 40 wt% or greater 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007