Ex Parte CHENG et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered             
                           today was not written for publication and                  
                             is not binding precedent of the Board                    
                                                       Paper No. 10                   
                                                                                     
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                              Ex parte CHIEH-MIN CHENG                                
                                   And MIN-HONG FU                                    
                                     ___________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2002-0178                                  
                             Application No. 09/385,909                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
          Before OWENS, WALTZ and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                   
          1-37, 41, and 43.  A copy of each of these claims is set forth in           
          the attached appendix.                                                      
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          unpatentability are:                                                        
          Lundberg et al. (Lundberg)         4,387,174      June  7, 1983             
          Beach et al. (Beach)              5,719,204      Feb. 17, 1998             
          Satake et al. (Satake)             5,814,685      Sep. 29, 1998             
          Wong et al. (Wong ‘695)            5,762,695      June  9, 1998             
          Wong et al. (Wong ‘043)            5,837,043      Nov. 17, 1998             
          Puschak et al. (Puschak)      5,849,833           Dec. 15, 1998             
          Lin                              5,851,274      Dec. 22, 1998             
          Villiger et al. (Villiger)         5,852,073      Dec. 22, 1998             
          Collins et al. (Collins)      5,891,950           Apr.  6, 1999             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007