Ex Parte BOLDIZAR - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2002-0220                                                                  Page 3                 
              Application No. 08/964,496                                                                                   


                                    a pair of slides, mounted on the frame, for engaging                                   
                            the linear channel;                                                                            
                                    wherein the window is evenly supported in the                                          
                            channel and prevented from sudden downward movement.                                           
                            17.  A tool for preventing sudden downward movement of a                                       
                            vehicle door window, the window including a glass panel                                        
                            disposed for free-moving vertical movement in a window                                         
                            channel bounded by inner and outer door panels, the                                            
                            window tool comprising                                                                         
                                    a frame;                                                                               
                                    attachment means disposed in the frame for                                             
                            removably attaching the housing to the glass panel; and                                        
                            channel support means disposed within the housing for                                          
                            preventing downward movement of the frame below the                                            
                            height of the window channel.                                                                  
                     The following rejections are before us for review.                                                    
                     Claims 1-3, 7, 9-11, 15 and 17-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                          
              being anticipated by Taylor1.                                                                                
                     Claims 4, 6, 12 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                               
              unpatentable over Taylor.                                                                                    
                     Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                         
              the appellant regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the answer                          
              (Paper No. 12) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections and to                     
              the brief (Paper No. 11) for the appellant's arguments thereagainst.                                         
                                                        OPINION                                                            

                     1 U.S. Pat. No. 5,398,602, issued March 21, 1995 to Kim S. Taylor.                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007