Ex Parte OBERG et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2002-0225                                                                          Page 2                   
               Application No. 08/332,275                                                                                             


                                                         BACKGROUND                                                                   
                       The appellants' invention relates to a boot having a rigid tread sole and an insole                            
               formed of soft, cushioning, light weight, thermal insulating material.  A copy of the                                  
               claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                             


                       The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                                
               appealed claims are:                                                                                                   
               Makovski                                        3,007,184                      Nov.   7, 1961                          
               Desma-Werke GmbH.                       GB 1,145,809                           Mar. 19, 1969                           
               (Desma-Werke)                                                                                                          
               Vibram S.P.A.                           FR 2,034,8281                          Dec. 18, 1970                           
               (Vibram)                                                                                                               



                       Claims 19 to 21, 23, 25 and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                    
               paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the                          
               subject matter which the appellants regard as the invention.                                                           


                       Claims 17, 19, 21, 25, 26 and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                    
               being anticipated by Vibram.                                                                                           


                       1 In determining the teachings of Desma-Werke, we will rely on the translation provided by the                 
               USPTO.  A copy of the translation is attached for the appellants' convenience.                                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007