Appeal No. 2002-0331
Application No. 09/382,735
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Fox 3,031,205 Apr. 24, 1962
Keller 3,733,090 May 15, 1973
Adams 4,898,399 Feb. 6, 1990
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 9 through 11 and 13 through 15 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as lacking descriptive support
in the original disclosure.
Claims 9 through 11 and 13 through 15 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Keller in view of
Adams and Fox.
The full text of the examiner’s rejections and response to
the argument presented by appellant appears in the final
rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 5 and 11 ), while the complete
statement of appellant’s argument can be found in the main and
reply briefs (Paper Nos. 9 and 12).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007