Appeal No. 2002-0331
Application No. 09/382,735
trailer together at an angle to prevent pivotal movement and
jackknifing, would not have provided a suggestion for the
extensive reworking of the Keller apparatus to achieve the
locking mechanism of appellant’s claim 9. For the above reasons,
the obviousness rejection cannot be sustained.
In summary, this panel of the board has not sustained the
description and obviousness rejections on appeal.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007