The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANDREW JOHN WARD and DAVID CHARLES HURST
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0346
Application No. 08/952,673
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3, 9-
13 and 20. Claims 7 and 19 have been allowed and claims 4-6, 8 and 14-18 have been
indicated as containing allowable subject matter but objected to for depending from a
rejected claim (Paper No. 16, page 4).
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007