Ex Parte JAFFE - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not
                                          binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                                                                             Paper No. 27                     

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                                         Ex parte ROBERT L. JAFFE                                             
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 2002-0444                                              
                                          Application No. 09/086,138                                          
                                                __________                                                    
                                           HEARD: October 8, 2002                                             
                                                __________                                                    
            Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ADAMS and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.                           
            WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    
                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final               
            rejection of claims 1 through 15, all of the claims in the application.  Claim 1 is               
            representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:                              
            1.     A method for evaluating a whole effluent sample for the presence of cytotoxic              
            substances comprising the steps of:                                                               
                   (a) obtaining a sample for testing suspected of containing a plurality of potentially      
                      cytotoxic substances;                                                                   
                   (b) combining a first aliquot of the whole effluent sample directly with a first           
                      culture of a particle-feeding flagellate; and                                           
                   (c) monitoring the growth of the particle-feeding flagellate culture in the presence       
                      of the whole effluent sample, wherein a decrease in growth of the culture in            







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007