The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte EDWARD A. SWINK, CLAYTON M. SMITH, CARL L. MURPHY and RICK LAVELOCK __________ Appeal No. 2002-0492 Application 09/348,141 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Edward A. Swink et al. appeal from the final rejection of claim 16. Claims 1, 8 through 12, 14 and 15, the only other claims pending in the application, stand allowed. THE INVENTION The appellants’ invention relates to “a folding ramp that provides access between two surfaces of different heights, such 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007