Ex Parte SWINK et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-0492                                                        
          Application 09/348,141                                                      

          as from a truck or dock surface to the ground surface”                      
          (specification, page 1).  Appealed claim 16 reads as follows:               
               16.  A folding portable ramp, comprising:                              
               a first platform section having first and second ends;                 
               a second platform section having first and second ends, said           
          first end of said second section pivotally coupled to said second           
          end of said first section, said second section adapted to be                
          pivoted relative to said first section between a storage position           
          wherein said second section overlies said first section and an              
          extended position, wherein said first and second sections form an           
          obtuse angle; and                                                           
               a leg support structure pivotally coupled to at least one of           
          said second end of said first section and said first end of said            
          second section, said leg support structure adapted to be pivoted            
          between a first position, wherein said leg support structure                
          overlies said second section when said section is in said storage           
          position, and a second position wherein said leg support                    
          structure extends outwardly away from said first and second                 
          sections;                                                                   
               and wherein said leg support structure includes a latching             
          mechanism that releasably maintains said leg support structure in           
          said second position.                                                       
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being             
          unpatentable over U.S. Patent No. 4,795,304 to Dudley.                      
               Attention is directed to the appellants’ brief (Paper No.              
          10) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 11) for the                     
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner with                
          regard to the merits of this rejection.                                     




                                          2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007